Thread:Gsimenas/@comment-24451905-20140315015822/@comment-6697950-20140315120447

The image guideline post was highlighted just several hours before his first infringement and it was repeated after a personal message-warning. Normally, that would sound like intentional malicious behaviour and, according to your system, that would be worthy of a ban. Plus, you didn't formalise the 3 warning then ban system, you set up a system where if something looks to be intentional malicious behaviour, it deserves a ban. So, according to your logic, I could report the case to you (what you do after that is not my decision, the fact remains that the case would be reported, so I wasn't lying). See what I mean that we need a formal system for this?