Board Thread:Editor Board/@comment-6697950-20130615181423/@comment-6697950-20130620065448

Well, that's partially correct. One use for the template would be to claim an article or part of it, but the other intention for the template would be to mark an incomplete portion of it, so that theeditors who don't have anything to do would be able to find something to do more easily.

So, basically, if an editor finds an incomplete/outdated section or article that is not a stub, they mark the incomplete portion with. If the said editor wants to work on that portion himself/herself or if another editor comes by and wantsto claim the article, then they would change the template to to claim the said portion.

This would be especially useful for chronology sections, as they do take a bit of time to write and tend to be rather long. Personally speaking, I'd use this template to publish my projects when they're not yet completed to make proofreading easier (as most of my projects tend to be 8,000-25,000 bytes in size when they are completed... try finding proofreaders for that... x.x).

And about the third condition, I believe changing it to "can't keep the article claimed for x days without an update" would be more logical and fair.

About the 4th condition, I personally keep track of all of my projects on my profile page. Butif we're making a page for it, we should name it as "projects" or something, as we already have a watchist...