Thread:Wikiwalker11291/@comment-6697950-20161013172736/@comment-6697950-20161013183056

Whenever you see a category that you've never used before and the category is strangely missing on quite a few pages, you should really be concerned that there might be a good reason for that. It's always best to inspect a category before adding anything to it. Adding categories blindly is likely to lead to problems.

Well, as you should have seen with your edit on the Holy Sword quest page, double edits make it inconvenient to undo them easily and still provide comments on what was wrong. So it's in your best interest to not spam edits :P Visual should have a built-in source editor as well. You should be able to switch between them without needing to publish the edit. Of course, I never use that annoying Visual, so I could be wrong :D

It's not really informative when the references are at the end of a paragraph. A reference at the end of the paragraph kinda implies that the whole paragraph is references with it. But, this was not the case in your edits, so they caused unnecessary confusion. A reference should only be at the end of a paragraph if it's meant to cover the entire paragraph. Otherwise, it should be at the end of a sentence or part of a sentence that is being sourced.

If the article is readable without the additions, then you don't need to add a UC to mark that it's not perfect. Just get around to it at your own pace. The UC is meant for pages that are REALLY begging for some overhauling, not for pages that could use tweaking, but are otherwise presentable.