Thread:Wikiwalker11291/@comment-6697950-20160726074433

I've noticed that whenever you edit a volume summary for example, you mark your edit as having edited a specific section, but you're actually editing several sections in that one edit. It would be nice if you refrained from making your edit comments so misleading.

Also, I believe you misunderstand what "cleanup" means. The cleanup template is used to mark articles that have problems with grammar, punctuation, spelling, style, phrasing, transition, logic or is messy in some other way and a cleanup is an attempt to fix these problems. A cleanup usually means working with existing content to make it less messy. Some more details can be added as part of the process if something is needed for proper transition or some text could be rewritten if it's so inaccurate that it's beyond saving (e.g. the volume 9 summary is largely inaccurate in a lot of places, so a lot of it has to be rewritten to clean up). However, effectively increasing the content on an already large page 2.65 times by adding a ton of new details is more like a revamp than a cleanup. That's of course a very nice way to contribute, but when you're using the wrong expressions to describe your edits, it's once again misleading to other editors. So, by all means, continue improving the summaries in any way you'd like, but just remember to comment on your edits appropriately.

P.S. If you're planning to be a regular here, I recommend coming up on the chat at some point to meet and chat with the rest of the community here. 