Thread:Wikiwalker11291/@comment-6697950-20160925111557

If you have time to look up which chapters a character appears in for just several sentences-worth of appearance in each, it would be best to either just summarise the character's role in each volume right away, or just create a single UC label at the top, and use the "Missing Information" parameter to specify the chapters in which you've spotted the character. Creating five and more empty sections for just a paragraph of content makes the article look like an underdeveloped construction site unnecessarily. It's one thing when a character has a major role and it will definitely take time to finish summarising their entire role - the section-based UC templates allow people to adopt a specific section, so that they wouldn't have to bear the burden of the entire article, and thus allow other people to contribute to the other sections. In this case, the messiness is still justifiable. However, it's rather pointless to do section-based UC labels for minor roles - it's not a long-term project, so there's no real point in adopting specific sections. And the section-based UC doesn't explain which chapters was the character even present in. Which is why it's sufficient to just list all the missing sections at the very top of the page in a single UC. 