Thread:Singsweet23/@comment-6697950-20151009074024/@comment-6697950-20151010224932

I've read the page that you've republished, and I have to say that it's just barely away from being deleted again. Practically, the majority of the article is riddled with unsourced claims, factual inaccuracies, irrelevant information and other major problems. For each claim you make, you should give an example or a reference that supports your claim. A lot of your claims are way too assumptive, for example, what proof do you have that Asuna is letting Silica lean on her because she treats her as a child? There was no reason given for why she did that, so you're assumption is way too personal. And you can't say "often" if you only have one example, unless you provide a reference to where it was specifically mentioned that it's not a one-time thing.

If it wasn't for the Kirito section that's at least somewhat decent, I probably wouldn't have bothered editing it, and even that section could use some citing (I did say that Kirito's relationship page is a bad example of how to do an article), but at least the source of the majority of that info is widely known.