Thread:Wikiwalker11291/@comment-6697950-20161108162236/@comment-6697950-20161110081003

On the weapon list, we don't cover history or design. The former is trivia material for an in-game gun, while I'm not really sure if we cover design even on the articles for the guns themselves. So, for an article where we only list items without too much detail, referencing an instance that only describes a real world gun without even stating that the gun exists in the game only makes it harder to validate content, as you end up looking through irrelavant references until you actually reach the relevant references.

As for reference order, I ordered them by informativeness. If one reference has the history, description and even users of the weapon, as well as the name for the weapon, then it's by far more useful than a reference with only the name of the weapon, but neither users, description or any other details. Since it's more useful, I ordered it first to reduce pointless lookups when trying to validate info (e.g. if you look up chromatic colors, you can already find both the name and the user, so you don't need to look up Calibur as well, while if you look up Calibur first, you'll still have to look up chromatic colors because you won't find everything in Calibur).