Thread:Shawn Roberts/@comment-32769624-20190316182036/@comment-6697950-20191215005823

The content you touched on the Asuna relationships article was commented out for a reason. It had serious issues that made it inappropriate for public display. Instead of trying to fix the noted issues to make the content good enough for release, you just removed the notes and uncommented them anyway. Then when I undid the edit because you didn't fix anything, you just removed the existing content entirely and wrote in a "TBA" instead.

1. Removing content without good reason is considered vandalism.

2. We have a set format for incomplete sections and sections with zero viable content. A random "TBA" isn't it. We use templates to mark issues, not visible personal comments. In this case, Under Construction is used.

Since this was the second time you made a counter-productive edit, I gave you a warning ban. All it does is restrict your ability to edit for 2 hours to prevent any rash edits (which usually happens in cases like these, based on experience) and prompt you to think about your edits, instead of repeating the same thing again. If you disagree with something, you are free to bring it up for discussion. That doesn't mean you should cause an edit war by obstinately trying to make an edit your way without talking out the issue.