Thread:Wraiyf/@comment-24764738-20140328021635/@comment-3551173-20140328055607

Alright, but you know he'll be irritated that he has to go through them. Also,  it's not like I don't understand your perspective as well, but (... some kind of preachy thing that shows I'm sympathetic to both sides and understand ...) that's how a wikia is run. You know what I'll write out the preachy thing:

Damien is a new editor, yes, his edits some are redundant or require refining, Wraiyf instead of saying that you fixed up his edits explain how, and that way he can make better edits in the future.

Wraiyf is an experienced editor, so trust his perspective on the content each page needs and doesn't need. Damien when he does revert your edits re-check what you added, and then ask yourself why it was removed and then ask him nicely for further information if you can't find out why.

Remember this wikia runs on respect for the series, the wikia, me and the editors which are both of you.

This argument started because at first both of you took a hostile tone, instead of hostility explain in detail. For example, Damien made an edit, Wraiyf reverts, I went to the top you said redundancy but didn't point out how it is redundant in context of the page. Damien,  trust  me when I say this alot of edits are often reverted, you can not take it personally, this wikia has been around for a while (2 years) we have only so much available content before we run out of stuff to edit, so adding new content is tough, but that shouldn't stop you from trying, some of your edits will stick and if you stay here long enough you can learn some things about  editing that you didn't know earlier.

I declare this argument over, this isn't about the edits this is about how the dispute that arose and how both parties handled it. Argue against me at your peril.