Thread:Wikiwalker11291/@comment-17964257-20190516193005/@comment-6697950-20190517192312

Your "schedule" is basically just an excuse for any kind of edit you can make. I can understand making an edit to celebrate a certain characters birthday (though I do find all your edit comments cringey at best), but you're basically making edits for almost any event —— a lot of which I wouldn't even think of commemorating —— or whatever you can find on the timeline. Instead of waiting for your previous edit to be reviewed, you jump at any excuse you can to churn out another paragraph somewhere. Your selfishness forces me to resort to damage control - rushing to your edits before they pile up too much that they'd be forgotten for years on end (I still have yet to get some of your edits from over three years ago, after all, with all your spamming), which comes at the cost of harming any other editor on the wiki considerate enough to not push their own stuff when I'm stuck cleaning up after you. But you never seem to care that your rush to get your own content out comes at the price of other people being unable to work on their own stuff. I understand the frustration of editors like Kaan, but I am only one man and you are forcing my hands.

For the record, the main reason you're going at a snail's pace is, ironically, specifically because of all your rushing to churn out paragraphs left and right. What the heck is the point in writing tons of paragraphs, if I have to cut them all in half in the end? Not only does that waste your own time, it also wastes my time, which means that other people suffer, as I have a limited amount of time that I can dedicate to reviews when I also have Uni and SAO translations to do. Instead of writing one decent paragraph, you always choose to write 2-3 or even more paragraphs for what can be covered in a single one. So, you're actually making your job much more unnecessarily drawn out than it should be. If you'd take the time to actually work on the quality than the quantity, I'd have less issues to correct per edit and you'd be wasting less of your own time on unnecessary ramblings about irrelevant story details. That's a double timesaver that would have allowed you to finish more of your projects by now. Heck, a lot of your edits are currently going for naught, as they don't even appear on the articles because either I've been unable to get to them with all the workload you're giving me, or because they were reviewed, but you never bothered to tie up the loose ends.

Which wouldn't be a problem, if you bothered to go over your stuff a second time to get rid of the stuff that contributes nothing to understanding the plot. Almost all of your edits are plagued by the fact that 50% of the content is irrelevant or needlessly excessive. If you were paying attention to the quality of your writing and not veering away from the point, you'd be keeping strict tabs on how long each of your edits ends up and wouldn't be having your "difficult [...] to properly estimate how big or small they'll end up" problem.

If I specifically reviewed your edit to the end, left you notes on further issues, and haven't touched the article in several hours, it's pretty safe to assume that I'm done with it, unless I specifically state that I'm not done yet. If anything, you jumping around from article to article without fixing your old issues (or waiting for your previous edit to be reviewed) gets on my nerves. I specifically leave notes for you in hopes that you'll focus on them with your next edit, rather than pull out a brand new paragraph somewhere. Your commented out edits will not see the day of light if you refuse to fix your issues and instead focus only on overloading me even more, which means that that's a lot of your own time and effort going down the drain, like Kaan mentioned above.