User blog comment:Gsimenas/Unital Ring Content vs Spoiler/@comment-29759785-20181208092904/@comment-6697950-20181208100956

>Is there something like that? I don't understand

Well, take Vassago for example. His real identity was meant to be a major reveal in Alicization. So, do we change the name of his article and spoil people as soon as they click on the article even though they weren't expecting to be spoiled as he was a returning character? Better yet, if you rename his article, whoever types out his avatar name in the search bar will automatically see his real name. So, you don't even need to go on the article to get spoiled. How exactly are you going to tag that as a spoiler? There's also the leading paragraph and infobox issues I mentioned in my original post.

>I said not to include the spoilers at all in these cases

I didn't notice any such statement.

>I doubt "outside" people would start doing the same suddenly

There's always the issue of randoms who read summaries or something coming up on the wiki to post the most major of spoilers on random articles. That's the very reason this is a concern and we should have a policy in place for such cases. My example of Eugeo literally involved some random guy who just randomly decided to spoil me like that.