Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-98.95.22.178-20140731190807/@comment-75.164.234.229-20140909005403

1caiser wrote: Reki was very insistent on not making 16.5 non-canon.

To put it bluntly, no amount of "research" or "proof" will change our stance of accepting the act of intercourse between Kirito and Asuna as canon. The only proof we will accept is by Reki's own word that 16.5, or the act, was canon. Until then, this argument can be laid to rest. If Reki was very insistent on NOT making 16.5 NON-canon then the double negative would mean that it is canon.