Thread:Wikiwalker11291/@comment-6697950-20161213093852

I saw you uploaded two new images to the wiki. However, the only category you added was "character images"... which is in no way informative to anyone managing images and is actually even LESS useful than no categories at all (when an image is not categorised at all, at least it automatically appears in a special list). Categories like character images, location images, object images and so on are only supplementary - they may help some user find an image by searching by content instead of by source, but adding them does not make the image count as properly categorised. Only images with a category that indicates the source are considered to be properly categorised.

Since I've already told you about this numerous times, I have to give you a formal warning this time - the next time I see an image added to an article without proper categorisation, the edits will be rolled back. 