Thread:Wikiwalker11291/@comment-6697950-20161013172736

I've looked through your latest edits and notices several issues that I felt I should bring up.

First of all, as you've already experienced, you should double check what a category is used for before adding it. You should not add categories randomly.

Another thing that really caught my attention is the edit spam you made. I can understand two or three edits in a row if you really missed some mistake or for some other valid reason. But making 6 edits in a row is overkill. Please review your edits before publishing them to avoid this. And please change to source in-Visual to correct references and stuff in the same edit, not make double edits every time you want to make a reference or edit an infobox. It makes it annoying to review your edits, as I then have to go to history to see the final result of your edits. Oh, and double edits impede regular edit undos - when you make two edits in a row, another editor can't just undo the edit and add a comment why the edit was undone, so if the editor has rollback privilege, they might just rollback your edits in one go and you'll be left without an explanation.

Also, due to confusion concerns, you should not add categories to canon articles based on games. Argo has never been confirmed to be playing ALO at all, let along being a Cait Sith if she does play it, in the canon material. That's why we never added those categories to her page. Imagine if you added SAO Player and SAO Survivor categories to Leafa's page, even though that only applies to the alternative game universe. It would really confuse any passers-by who aren't too knowledgeable about the series. That's why we have a policy that categories should be added based on canon content (except when the character is only present in non-canon content).

Now for referencing. It's very pointless if you indicate a reference to both the novel and the anime at the end of the paragraph. It's about as useful as no references at all, as not all of the details will be actually mentioned in the novel. References should be added specifically - marking where each detail came from to make it clear whether the detail is based on the novel (and if so, which volume and chapter for lookup) or whether it's based on the anime. This is important because the anime changes some things and in cases of conflict, the novel version is considered to be the leading version.

As for Under Construction template use: 1) You must mark any empty sections with it. 2) The UC template is only used if there's a great lack in content. Any article can be improved ad infinitum and we'd become a construction site rather than a wiki if we marked every single article that's not 100% perfect. As such, if there are some slight improvements that can be made, but are not vital to the article, either just make the improvements or leave the article alone. Someone else will get around to it if they see a need to do so.

I think that's all for now. You've really been active today :P 