Thread:24.122.172.111/@comment-26391060-20140617050328/@comment-6697950-20140617094530

I doubt that you'll see this message, but whatever. oo and ou are identical long O sounds, which is why both sounds can be romanised as ō, which represents an elongated vowel o. The only difference between the two sounds is how you insert the kanji which has these sounds.

Though I do have to admit that a very few changes were correct. However, the problem with those was that the kanji in those cases had alternative readings. For example, 明日 is usually read as "ashita", but can also be read as "asu" or "myounichi". Knowing the language doesn't help much in such situations, so someone who made the romanisations just made a mistake. That does NOT mean that you can go ahead and insult them like that.